Was Kelly Johnson a HET?


It's interesting to evaluate the lives of certain individuals who achieve levels of success on Earth and see if they fit a pattern for matching criteria that may demonstrate they were HET. This is only an observation and/or speculation. There obviously is no way to confirm it. This is a key reason you should focus on EA Group Mode before spending time trying to evaluate individuals as possible HET. Over time, when you are aware there are a vast number of Hetlau, you see consistent themes running through certain individuals lives that make you wonder.


KellyJohnson-and-GaryPowers-3_1200 × 847.jpg

When you look at criteria for someone who might be a HET the first thing is can two people who have never met the person say their name and they both know who it is. In other words, has the person achieved a level of notoriety the makes them publicly recognizable? This is important because HET would know how to control their comments publicly and complicit EA becoming famous on Earth would have to be advised secretly what to do and not do. This is how the public discussion of HET never rises up. 

The next thing to look at is how did the person affect society. Did the actions they employed while they were on Earth meet the criteria for misdirection and/or subliminal dissemination. At first glance, Kelly Johnson does not immediately appear to start to meet the criteria. Although he is famous he is not a well known public figure except in aviation and military circles. That is where things change though. 

Johnson won his first prize for an aircraft design at 13. Most people would automatically just attribute it to "he's a natural". That's fine except once you realize there are Hetlau and they would have access to technology and scripted lives that would defy EA capabilities, individuals who exhibit those trends become candidates for HET assessment.

The list of accomplishments in the aviation industry both civilian and military is difficult to match. The two most important things to highlight about his career though are:

  1. The CIA had him develop Groom Lake which later became Area 51
  2. He developed the SR-71 Blackbird

 

The reason these two EvenTs are so important is that you could start with the Wright Brothers aka The ET Flight Brothers, make a connection to Area 51 and the SR-71, and draw a logical conclusion to ETS. Essentially, all the other events in aviation are just a waste of time to evaluate when you realize what is really going on. 

The reason is the Wright Brothers needed to put the process of Flying on the planet but it was Kelly Johnson that needed to focus the direction of aviation to possess the capability of building ETS. In order to do that he needed to design an aircraft and support facility that would take the aviation industry in that direction. No EA would be capable of having the foresight to put all those pieces of the puzzle together.

The SR-71 was built at during a time when computer technology was so primitive that the whole thing had to be designed by hand using slide rules. Its ability to fly higher and faster than anything even close to it, along with all of its revolutionary concepts and the ability to withstand the heat at Mach 3+ have people in awe of it saying how it was "way ahead of its time" for that era. They have even had modern computers analyze it and not offer any design changes.

What EA don't realize is what appears as a stroke of genius could have been a just another boring project management implementation of a system designed in advance of Earth's existence and designed on more advanced computers than EA have ever even seen. Since EA don't know these possibilities exist or believe these possibilities exist they just attribute everything to natural phenomena. Once you know they exist suddenly the amazing seem mundane.

Even today the SR-71 still holds all the records for highest / fastest flying aircraft publically disclosed. Where the EA will get even more misdirection and subliminal dissemination is when the government releases stories about new aircraft/spacecraft that can exceed the SR-71 causing them to think its all part of a logical progression. What they don't realize and/or need to take into consideration is AIS have been transiting back and forth to Earth the whole time mankind has been on it. Any announcement of an aircraft / spacecraft short of an AIS / ETS is just misdirection and subliminal dissemination.

Next when you read his name using wormation:

CLARENCE KELLY JOHNSON

CLARENCE = CANCELRE (enagram)
CANCELRE = CANCEL RE (porpheme)
RE = REDESIGN (porpheme)

CLARENCE = CANCEL REDESIGN

KELLY = KEYLL (enagram)
KELLY = KEY LL (porpheme)
L = 12 (alphanumeric)
12 + 12 = 24
24 = X (alphanumeric)
X = eXtraterrestrial / Xbeing (ecronym)

KELLY = KEY EXTRATERRESTRIAL

JOHNSON = JOHN S ON (porpheme)
JOHN = JOIN (proximity)
S = 19 (alphanumeric)
ON = ONE (addition)
ONE = 1
19 + 1 = 20
20 = T (alphanumeric)
T = SPACECRAFT (ecronym)

JOHNSON = JOIN SPACECRAFT

CLARENCE KELLY JOHNSON =
CANCEL REDESIGN KEY EXTRATERRESTRIAL JOIN SPACECRAFT

The possibility that he would not need to actually design the SR-71 on Earth or in this case it would be redesigning it since it would already exist on other planetary systems and/or could have easily been designed on other planetary systems computer systems is present in his first name. Then his nickname and last name support his role in misdirecting the public into thinking US is developing a state of the art top secret spy plane when in fact all the resources and technology are just being aligned to fulfill the ETA of having an AIS base prior to disclosure.

The point to keep in mind is that just because he appears to have 4 areas of key evidence:

  1. Name is publicly recognizable
  2. Career work appears as misdirection
  3. appearing to be making the hand gesture
  4. appears his name says "Cancel Redesign Key Extraterrestrial Join Spacecraft"

none of this actually means anything for sure. What it does mean though and is key to seeing what is going on it is another example of precognition.

To most people, these repeating patterns don't seem like much, especially not enough to claim disclosure of ET & UFOs. Once you keep watching it occurring every day for years and develop an eye for it you will know it's going on even though others who won't spend the time trying to understand it can't see it.




Was Amelia Earhart a HET?


It's interesting to evaluate the lives of certain individuals who achieve levels of success on Earth and see if they fit a pattern for matching criteria that may demonstrate they were HET. This is only an observation and/or speculation. There obviously is no way to confirm it. This is a key reason you should focus on EA Group Mode before spending time trying to evaluate individuals as possible HET. Over time, when you are aware there are a vast number of Hetlau, you see consistent themes running through certain individuals lives that make you wonder.


Amelia_Earhart_630x420_Image_00.png

When you look at criteria for someone who might be a HET the first thing is can two people who have never met the person say their name and they both know who it is. In other words, has the person achieved a level of notoriety the makes them publicly recognizable? This is important because HET would know how to control their comments publicly and complicit EA becoming famous on Earth would have to be advised secretly what to do and not do. This is how the public discussion of HET never rises up. 

The next thing to look at is how did the person affect society. Did the actions they employed while they were on Earth meet the criteria for misdirection and/or subliminal dissemination. Cleary Amelia Earhart qualifies for each of those two criteria. You can mention her name and most people have heard of her. Her mysterious disappearance has redirected enormous amounts of time and resources wondering and trying to figure out what happened to her.

At first glance, everything seems normal it was just a combination of unfortunate circumstances that lead to the fateful EvenT. The problem is once you know Hetlau and their advanced technological abilities in every aspect of life everyone and everything becomes suspect to having a hidden purpose in mysterious events.

First, you have bizarre coincidences in her and Frederick Noonan's (navigator) names. When read using wormation:

AMELIA EARHART
AMELIA = AM ELIA (porpheme )
AM = I'M (porpheme)
ELIA = ALIE (enagram)
ALIE = ALIEN (porpheme)

EARHART = EAR H ART (porpheme)
EAR = NEAR (porpheme)
H = HOWLAND (ecronym)
ART = TRA (reversal)
TRA = TRAGEDY (porpheme)

AMELIA EARHART = I AM ALIEN TRAGEDY NEAR HOWLAND
Note: she disappeared trying to land on Howland Island

FREDERICK NOONAN
FREDERICK = F RED E RICK (porpheme)
F = FUEL (ecronym)
RED = LOW (synonym)
E = ET (ecronym)
RICK = TRICK (porpheme)

NOONAN = NO ON AN (porpheme)
NO = NO
ON = ONE (porpheme)
AN = ANSWER (porpheme)
ANSWER = TELL (synonym)

FREDERICK NOONAN = FUEL LOW ET TRICK TELL NO ONE
Note: the reason for their disappearance is considered due to running out of fuel before finding Howland Island.

Also, Oakland where the trip originated from

OAKLAND = OAK LAND (porpheme)
OAK = CLOAK (porpheme)
LAND = LANDING (porpheme)
or
LAND = ISLAND (porpheme)

OAKLAND = CLOAK LANDING
or
OAKLAND = CLOAK ISLAND

The origination point of the trip reveals a hidden clue she was hiding the secret of what was going to happen with her arrival landing, or that she knew she would not be able to see the Island.
Note: the reason for their disappearance is considered due to running out of fuel before finding Howland Island. They are to have presumed to have run out of fuel because they could not see the tiny island in the middle of the Pacific ocean.

Also, Howland Island the intended arrival location

HOWLAND = HOW DID I LAND

The Island she was intent on landing on reveals a hidden clue as to the biggest question of all, how and/or where did she land or crash into the ocean.

Also, the Navy support vessel Itasca

ITASCA = IT AS CA (porpheme)
IT = IT
AS = WAS (porpheme)
CA = CALCULATED (porpheme)

ITASCA = IT WAS CALCULATED or IT WAS PLANNED
Note: The ship sent to help her find Howland Islands name was Itasca.

In other words, she knew in advance she wouldn't be able to find where she was going to land and/or she secretly knew where she was going to land even though it appeared she would disappear.

The whole concept of not only her but of all the people who would have had to have been involved in it makes absolutely no sense from an EA point of view. As soon as you apply Hetlau and the need to perform misdirection on Earth it makes perfect sense. Then add to it all the hidden clues that leave the repeating patterns that reveal a preponderance of evidence in the absence of corroboration and you can tell something otherworldly was involved in it.

The point to keep in mind is that just because she appears to have 4 areas of key evidence:

  1. Name is publicly recognizable
  2. Career work appears as misdirection
  3. appearing to be making the hand gesture
  4. appears her name says "I am Alien Tragedy near Howland"

none of this actually means anything for sure. What it does mean though and is key to seeing what is going on it is another example of precognition.

To most people, these repeating patterns don't seem like much, especially not enough to claim disclosure of ET & UFOs. Once you keep watching it occurring every day for years and develop an eye for it you will know it's going on even though others who won't spend the time trying to understand it can't see it.




Was Walt Disney a HET?


It's interesting to evaluate the lives of certain individuals who achieve levels of success on Earth and see if they fit a pattern for matching criteria that may demonstrate they were HET. This is only an observation and/or speculation. There obviously is no way to confirm it. This is a key reason you should focus on EA Group Mode before spending time trying to evaluate individuals as possible HET. Over time when you are aware there are a vast number of Hetlau you see consistent themes running through certain individuals lives that make you wonder.


517258210.jpg

When you look at criteria for someone who might be a HET the first thing is can two people who have never met the person say their name and they both know who it is. In other words, has the person achieved a level of notoriety the makes them publicly recognizable? This is important because HET would know how to control their comments publicly and complicit EA becoming famous on Earth would have to be advised secretly what to do and not do. This is how the public discussion of HET never rises up. 

The next thing to look at is how did the person affect society. Did the actions they employed while they were on Earth meet the criteria for misdirection and/or subliminal dissemination. Although his company Walt Disney surely made shows and movies about ET that could qualify for subliminal dissemination the body of Walt's work would fall under misdirection. All you have to do is look at the enormous impact he has had on society. Then imagine the hours spent that kept people focused away from the ET & UFO phenomenon as well as the vast amount of financial resources that were redirected to facilitate the industry he basically created.

So he certainly has the necessary qualities in those categories. Then when you read his name using wormation:

DISNEY Definitely IS oNE Yes

It his pretty easy to see how you can get Definitely Is One Yes using ecronyms and porphemes.

Lastly, you want to look at images of him and see if you see signs of the hand gesture.


Walt_Disney_618x473_Image_00.png

The point to keep in mind is that just because he appears to have 4 areas of key evidence:

  1. Name is publicly recognizable
  2. Career work appears as misdirection
  3. appearing to be making the hand gesture
  4. appears his name says "Definitely is one yes"

none of this actually means anything for sure. What it does mean though and is key to seeing what is going on it is another example of precognition.

To most people, these repeating patterns don't seem like much, especially not enough to claim disclosure of ET & UFOs . Once you keep watching it occurring every day for years and develop an eye for it you will know it's going on even though others who won't spend the time trying to understand it can't see it.




Was Curtis LeMay a HET?

It's interesting to evaluate the lives of certain individuals who achieve levels of success on Earth and see if they fit a pattern for matching criteria that may demonstrate they were HET. This is only an observation and/or speculation. There obviously is no way to confirm it. This is a key reason you should focus on EA Group Mode before spending time trying to evaluate individuals as possible HET. Over time when you are aware there are a vast number of Hetlau you see consistent themes running through certain individuals lives that make you wonder.


9387891_3.jpg

Curtis LeMay is a well known figure though the primary area of his career we're focused on is his role as Air Force chief of staff from 1961-1965. People in the modern generation may not have heard of him if they don't study military history. He does not necessarily fit into the concept of two people being able to say his name and they both will know who he is as a well know public figure though.

As the Air Force chief of staff in the 60's he certainly would have known about UFOs since it was 20 years after Roswell. He is quoted on wikiquotes as have having been asked about them by Barry Goldwater:


I used to receive a hundred calls a year from people who wanted me to get into the Green Room at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, because that’s where the Air Force stored all the material gathered on UFOs. I once asked Curtis LeMay if I could get in that room, and he just gave me holy hell. He said, ‘Not only can’t you get into it but don’t you ever mention it to me again.’
— https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Curtis_LeMay

In addition, there are stories about him having made the following comments about UFOs

"The best information in my opinion on them is to be found in a book written by an Englishman explaining numerous such mysteries. He says that the first flying saucers were seen in Egypt about the year 3,000 B. C."


though they aren't atributed by any specific sources documented by wikiquotes.

You will notice back to his comments with Barry Goldwater that the mainstay of UFO research was being done at Wright Patterson field. We have seen from the article on the Wright brothers that "Wright" stands for ET Flight.

In addition, the word Patterson says

Patterns O or Obvious Patterns.

So the combination of the UFO research and Wright Patterson field is another example of the repeating patterns that reveal a preponderance of evidence in the absence of corroboration. It even says right in the name of the base where UFO research is occurring that it is Obvious repeating patterns that are revealing evidence of ET Flight in the absence of corroboration. Unfortunately it is just that, repeating patterns not proof. Until disclosure though that is all you are going to get and that is what you have to work with like a detective.

Understanding subliminal dissemination allows you to see him speaking about it to get people to think about it but not actually letting anyone realize what is really going on. As Air Force chief of staff within an actual Hextocracy that would have been his role. Keeping the UFO phenomenon under wraps would have been the number one goal.

What we do see though is he appears to be making the hand gesture in his Air Force photo:


9387891_3.jpg

When we look at his name using wormation:

LeMay
Le = ExtraterrestriaL (bracketing)
Ma = I am (reversal)
y = Yes (ecronym)

So LeMay says Yes I am Extraterrestrial

The point to keep in mind is that just because he appears to have 3 areas of key evidence:

  1. appearing to be performing subliminal dissemination as Air Force chief of staff
  2. appearing to be making the hand gesture
  3. appears his name says "Yes I am Extraterrestrial" 

none of this actually means anything for sure. What it does mean though and is key to seeing what is going on it is another example of the repeating patterns that reveal a preponderance of evidence in the absence of corroboration.

To most people, these repeating patterns don't seem like much, especially not enough to claim disclosure of ET and UFOs. Once you keep watching it occurring every day for years and develop an eye for it you will know it's going on even though others who won't spend the time trying to understand it can't see it.





Was Isaac Newton a HET?

It's interesting to evaluate the lives of certain individuals who achieve levels of success on Earth and see if they fit a pattern for matching criteria that may demonstrate they were HET. This is only an observation and/or speculation. There obviously is no way to confirm it. This is a key reason you should focus on EA Group Mode before spending time trying to evaluate individuals as possible HET. Over time when you are aware there are a vast number of Hetlau you see consistent themes running through certain individuals lives that make you wonder.

isaac_newton_720x880.jpeg

The criteria you are looking for is extensive and can be different with each individual and the circumstances that surround their life as well as the timeframe from which they lived.

One test is can you say the persons name and will most people know who the person is. The reason this is a criteria for a person who might be a HET is that HET control Earth by controlling society and they cannot have public figures walking around aimlessly voicing their opinion. Though they want it to appear that way the one subject matter that must be reigned in is Extraterrestrial. As HET become public figures they know to keep their comments within certain boundaries on the subject matter of Extraterrestrials. EA that rise to power have to be informed of this and told to maintain these boundaries, such that they become complicit in what is going on.

Another reason public figures are a criteria for a HET is that HET are privy to a vast sum of knowledge about how life on Earth works.  Many existed before Earth existed and are taking part in the plan or ETA that is being constructed on Earth. They have morphed and/or polymorphed themselves down here. This vast sum of knowledge, taking part in the plan, and societal connections enable them to achieve success on Earth much easier than EA can.

You can look for images of them to see if they are making the hand gesture. Are they appearing in photographs with other individuals they clearly know well that are making the hand gesture as well? Trying to ascertain whether someone might be a HET is sort of like being a detective or private eye, you are constantly looking for clues because no one is going to admit it or help you figure it out.

Isaac Newton fits this profile. If you look at his name using wormation:
NEWTON = NOT NEW
So as a person who possibly lived before Earth existed and then morphed or polymorphed himself here on Earth he would have had access to information about how the laws of physics work that EA are not privy to or able to figure out until it is revealed to them, especially in the 1600's. Also if he was taking part in the plan to implement an ETA on Earth it would have been necessary to reveal certain laws of physics at a certain point in history in order to get Earth to develop the way they want.

Lastly, they want to leave clues around events to show to the EA after disclosure they have been here the whole time. So Newton's name translated as NOT NEW shows the laws of physics were not new to him and would fit the hypothesis of the clues showing the repeating patterns that reveal a preponderance of evidence. Then add to that that he appears to be making the hand gesture in pictures of him.

Isaac_Newton_clean_450x555_Image_00 (4).jpg

This still doesn't mean he is HET but it is interesting to point it out and it provides more clues which reveal those repeating patterns that provide a preponderance of evidence since there is lack of corroboration.

The key though is that when you start to review history with a perspective of Hetlau and you are looking for repeating patterns you are going to start to see a lot of them when you evaluate key individuals in history. In other words, these key individuals usually play a role in changing the way the planet and society work and this would be consistent with an ETA being constructed.




Was Howard Hughes a HET?

It's interesting to evaluate the lives of certain individuals who achieve levels of success on Earth and see if they fit a pattern for matching criteria that may demonstrate they were HET. This is only an observation and/or speculation. There obviously is no way to confirm it. This is a key reason you should focus on EA Group Mode before spending time trying to evaluate individuals as possible HET. Over time when you are aware there are a vast number of Hetlau you see consistent themes running through certain individuals lives that make you wonder.

The-Rake-Howard-Hughes-00003-1200x799.jpg

The criteria you are looking for is extensive and can be different with each individual and the circumstances that surround their life as well as the timeframe from which they lived.

One test is can you say the persons name and will most people know who the person is. The reason this is a criteria for a person who might be a HET is that HET control Earth by controlling society and they cannot have public figures walking around aimlessly voicing their opinion. Though they want it to appear that way the one subject matter that must be reigned in is Extraterrestrial. As HET become public figures they know to keep their comments within certain boundaries on the subject matter of Extraterrestrials. EA that rise to power have to be informed of this and told to maintain these boundaries, such that they become complicit in what is going on.

Another reason public figures are a criteria for a HET is that HET are privy to a vast sum of knowledge about how life on Earth works.  Many existed before Earth existed and are taking part in the plan or ETA that is being constructed on Earth. They have morphed and/or polymorphed themselves down here. This vast sum of knowledge, taking part in the plan, and societal connections enable them to achieve success on Earth much easier than EA can.

You can look for images of them to see if they are making the hand gesture. Are they appearing in photographs with other individuals they clearly know well that are making the hand gesture as well? Trying to ascertain whether someone might be a HET is sort of like being a detective or private eye, you are constantly looking for clues because no one is going to admit it or help you figure it out.

You can also try to read their names. sometimes this will add confluence to the clues. For example using wormation we get:
HUGHES = HES HUG (enagram)
HES =HE IS
HUG =
H = Humanoid
U = 21 (alphanumeric)
G = 7 (alphanumeric)
21 - 7 = 14
14 = 1 + 4 = 5
5 = E (alphanumeric)
E = ET (ecronym)
HUG = Humanoid ET or HET
Hughes =HE's HET when translated using wormation.

This still doesn't mean he is HET but it is interesting to point it out and it provides more clues which reveal those repeating patterns that provide a preponderance of evidence since there is lack of corroboration. 

Other criteria that surround an individual may be unique to each person. For instance, with Howard Hughes you notice the appearance of a UFO in the Howard Hughes Memorial Award. HET like to leave these hidden clues to make it easier to reveal they have been here the whole time when disclosure occurs.

98f8220ab9fd6973a900bb7907713111.jpg

Another important event in Howard Hughes life was the Spruce Goose's attempt at flight. To most people who do not understand Flying from an Extra Terrestrial perspective the Spruce Goose flew the moment it's body separated from the water in the Long Beach Harbor.

spruce-goose-top.gif

To people who understand flying from an Extra Terrestrial viewpoint, they know the plane is just transitioning it is not flying, there is a critical difference. What is happening is the plane is operating in a phenomenon known as ground effect. The area between the wing and the ground and/or water, in this case, is creating a compression effect which is providing additional lift. In order to actually be "flying" the plane needs to rise to 160' in altitude. That is 1/2 the distance of the wingspan of 320 feet which is the defining zone for ground effect. The plane only rose to 70 feet.

Until it reaches and exceeds 160 feet you don't know if the wings can actually generate enough lift for the plane to actually fly. So what you realize when you know Hetlau is that there are people on Earth, HET, and complicit EA that know this but just don't say anything because they know to manage and or control their comments. 

There are EA who know this that don't know Hetlau but regardless are not going make an issue out of this either because they don't want to ruin their aviation career or they simply don't want to be insulted as someone suffering from a delusional disorder and/or schizophrenic break from reality for trying to raise this to the level it needs to be evaluated at.

This event stands out enough to be viewed as misdirection as well as a hidden clue to be revealed after disclosure. It is also symptomatic of why the Ufology community cannot resolve the UFO phenomenon, they simply don't understand Flying well enough. Otherwise, they would be pointing out most UFOs don't have wings, and events like the Spruce Goose were not an example of flying.

You can even see it in the Wikipedia explanation of the event:

"After picking up speed on the channel facing Cabrillo Beach the Hercules lifted off, remaining airborne for 26 seconds at 70 ft (21 m) off the water at a speed of 135 miles per hour (217 km/h) for about one mile (1.6 km).[23] At this altitude the aircraft still experienced ground effect.[24] The brief flight proved to detractors that Hughes' (now unneeded) masterpiece was flight-worthy—thus vindicating the use of government funds.[25] The Spruce Goose, however, never flew again."

Notice how it says the aircraft still experienced ground effect. Then it goes on to say "brief flight, flight worthy, and never flew again". So there is no understanding that transitioning is a state of aerial maneuvering that is different than flying. Similar to how gliding is a state of aerial manuevering but technically you are not flying, you are gliding. That is why these words exist are used to describe what is happening in the aerial realm. To most Ufologists this is just over analysis and minutiea. It really is key to understanding the UFO phenomenon and in this case its a possible clue to Howard Hughes being a HET.